Joe,

I'd love to try it except I'm running x86 Debian Etch server.

Eliza.

On Sep 26, 1:20 am, Joe Slagel <jsla...@systemsbiology.org> wrote:
> Eliza,
>
> I may have another alternative for you, but I can't make any promises it'll
> work.  I played around a little today with building rpb/deb packages for
> TPP. If your feeling experimental, your welcome to try downloading and
> installing it.  You can get it from our ftp site 
> atftp://ftp.systemsbiology.net/TPP/tpp_4.3.1-1_amd64.deb.  This is a 64-bit
> AMD build, on Ubuntu 9.04 "server" that does not contain any dependencies
> (you'll still have to follow the TPP  instructions to install them).   If
> you have different platform/OS version I may be able to make another package
> that will work for you.
>
> To install it, use dpkg as so:
>
> % dpkg -i tpp_4.3.1-1_amd64.deb
>
> The default installation location is /usr/tpp.
>
> Cheers,
> Joe
>
> P.S. You should consider it very *EXPERIMENTAL* as I only tested a few
> simple operations.
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Joe Slagel <jsla...@systemsbiology.org>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hi Eliza,
>
> > I was following this thread and all of the good advice you've been getting
> > to try to solve the problem.  I think I saw in an email that you were using
> > Ubuntu 9.04.  Is this correct, and do you know if its the desktop or server
> > and whether its 32 or 64 bit?
>
> > Thanks
>
> > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Eliza <blond...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Any more suggestions?  There is quite a lot of interest in getting TPP
> >> running in the lab and at this point I am not sure how to proceed.
>
> >> On Sep 18, 8:15 pm, Brian Pratt <brian.pr...@insilicos.com> wrote:
> >> > (FWIW, Ubuntu is a flavor of Debian)
>
> >> > That's interesting - does "make clean all" work after your first "make
> >> > all"?  It sounds like the build is somehow changing the environment, or
> >> > maybe even its own makefiles...
>
> >> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Eliza <blond...@googlemail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > > I haven't tried your suggestion of running it on another distro yet
> >> > > Natalie, but I did get the latest version when that was announced and
> >> > > I got a little bit further.  I was able to run 'make all' without any
> >> > > errors, but when I run try to run 'make install' I'm back with the
> >> > > error message "Makefile.incl:431: /Makefile.pwiz.incl: No such file or
> >> > > directory
> >> > > make: *** No rule to make target `/Makefile.pwiz.incl'.  Stop."
>
> >> > > I am not using Ubuntu, but Debian.
>
> >> > > On Sep 4, 8:40 pm, Natalie Tasman <natalie.tas...@insilicos.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >  > Hi Eliza,
>
> >> > > > At this point, it might be worthwhile trying to compile the TPP on
> >> > > > another linux distribution that works well.  For example, Ubuntu
> >> > > > 8.04.  Then, I'd be sure to run the correct "install prerequisites"
> >> > > > file from tpp/installer_linux to make sure all the required system
> >> > > > packages are installed.
>
> >> > > > Then again, it wouldn't hurt to run the correct  "install
> >> > > > prerequisites" for your own system.  Currently, the Ubuntu 9.04
> >> script
> >> > > > seems to work for 9.10 also, if you're using that.
>
> >> > > > Good luck,
>
> >> > > > Natalie
>
> >> > > > On Sep 4, 2009, at 1:05 AM, Eliza wrote:
>
> >> > > > > Mike - having an empty Makefile.config.incl didn't fix anything.
> >>  I am
> >> > > > > still getting the error:  make: *** No rule to make target `/
> >> > > > > Makefile.pwiz.incl'.  Stop.
>
> >> > > > > On Sep 1, 10:21 pm, Mike Coleman <tutu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >> Okay, this turned out to be useful.  It appears that the contents
> >> of
> >> > > > >> your file 'Makefile.config.incl' is including itself (it appears
> >> to
> >> > > > >> be
> >> > > > >> a copy of 'Makefile.incl').  This recurses about 1000 times, at
> >> which
> >> > > > >> point you hit the file handle limit.  The resulting error is
> >> > > > >> apparently ignored due to the '-include'.
>
> >> > > > >> So, either make 'Makefile.config.incl' an empty file, or
> >> otherwise I
> >> > > > >> think it should be just a short file including a few variable
> >> > > > >> definitions.  Also, verify that neither of these files is a
> >> symbolic
> >> > > > >> or hard link to the other.
>
> >> > > > >> Probably this will fix things, or at least move things forward.
>
> >> > > > >> Mike
>
> >> > > > >> On Aug 31, 2:34 am, Eliza <blond...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > >>> OK I have added make.strace.gz to the file uploads.
>
> >> > > > >>> On Aug 28, 6:34 pm, Mike Coleman <tutu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > >>>> Okay, if you really want to bring out the big guns, do
> >> something
> >> > > > >>>> like
> >> > > > >>>> this
>
> >> > > > >>>>     $ strace -f -s 1024 -v -o make.strace make
>
> >> > > > >>>> and put the resulting 'make.strace' log somewhere where we can
> >> > > > >>>> look at
> >> > > > >>>> it.  I think this is erroring out pretty quickly, so hopefully
> >> that
> >> > > > >>>> log won't be too huge.  No promises, but this may very well
> >> clarify
> >> > > > >>>> what's going wrong.
>
> >> > > > >>>> You'll have to install the strace package if it's not already
> >> > > > >>>> present.
>
> >> > > > >>>> Mike
>
> >> > > > >>>> On Aug 28, 4:59 am, Eliza <blond...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > >>>>> That doesn't make any difference.
>
> >> > > > >>>>> On Aug 27, 8:12 pm, "Brian Pratt" <brian.pr...@insilicos.com>
> >> > > > >>>>> wrote:
>
> >> > > > >>>>>> Yeah, that's what we use here too.  Perhaps you could try it
> >> as
> >> > > > >>>>>> a different,
> >> > > > >>>>>> newly created user?  It sounds like there is something
> >> peculiar
> >> > > > >>>>>> about your
> >> > > > >>>>>> shell setup.
>
> >> > > > >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > >>>>>> From: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com
>
> >> > > > >>>>>> [mailto:spctools-disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Eliza
> >> > > > >>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009 12:13 AM
> >> > > > >>>>>> To: spctools-discuss
> >> > > > >>>>>> Subject: [spctools-discuss] Re: Failure with make
>
> >> > > > >>>>>> Bash
>
> >> > > > >>>>>> On Aug 20, 11:55 pm, "Brian Pratt" <
> >> brian.pr...@insilicos.com>
> >> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
> >> > > > >>>>>>> We basically tried that already: Eliza says the suggested
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> export PWD=/opt/trans_proteomic_pipeline/src ; make all
> >> install
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> did not work.  She also tried the "SRC_ROOT= $(shell pwd)"
> >> > > > >>>>>>> change to the
> >> > > > >>>>>>> makefile.  There's something deeper going on.
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Eliza, what shell do you use?  I do see from googling that
> >> > > > >>>>>>> $PWD might be
> >> > > > >>>>>>> bash-specific, possibly there are other unintended bash
> >> > > > >>>>>>> dependencies.
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Brian
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > > >>>>>>> From: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> [mailto:spctools-disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Mike
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Coleman
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 1:26 PM
> >> > > > >>>>>>> To: spctools-discuss
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Subject: [spctools-discuss] Re: Failure with make
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Eliza,
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> I'mstill suspicious about the $PWD thing.  If you're running
> >> > >  > >>>>>>> 'make'
> >> > > > >>>>>>> normally, you might try something like
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>     $ PWD=$(pwd) make ...
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> instead of just
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>     $ make ...
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> to see whether that improves your situation.  Alternatively,
> >> > > > >>>>>>> for the
> >> > > > >>>>>>> 'root' steps, you could do something like
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>>     $ sudo PWD=$(pwd) make ...
>
> >> > > > >>>>>>> Mike
>
> > --
> > Joe Slagel
> > Institute for Systems Biology
> > jsla...@systemsbiology.org
> > (206) 732-1362
>
> --
> Joe Slagel
> Institute for Systems Biology
> jsla...@systemsbiology.org
> (206) 732-1362

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spctools-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
spctools-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/spctools-discuss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to