Hello, On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Fernando Perez <fperez....@gmail.com> wrote: > But sage doesn't use the :param: style for parameters, does it? It > uses all-caps for informal section delimiting and regular bullet lists > (with dashes) for parameters (this is from the 'factor' docstring): > > INPUT: > > - ``n`` - an nonzero integer > > - ``proof`` - bool or None (default: None) > > I make the precision because I interpreted the OP's question as asking > about a project that would be using all the :param: & friends > machinery, not just avoiding post-processing (like numpydoc).
Yep, this is what I was talking about since the previous format just used a LaTeX \begin{itemize} and so it autoconverted to the above when we switched over to Sphinx. It'd be better to have something more standard, but the work just needs to be done. > Speaking of the $x$ patch, with Ondrej we're maintaining a few useful > such things on a public github repo: > > http://github.com/fperez/lacquer > > we hope that as these things stabilize and get cleaned up, we can > upstream them (I'm using that extension a lot, as :math:`x` inline is > simply intolerable for extensive markup). Cool. --Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sphinx-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to sphinx-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sphinx-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sphinx-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---