Joel, > Part of the reason we write restrictions and requirements into RFCs is so > that we do not have to repeat the arguments. > > If the proponents of the insertion have arguments for why it is now okay, > they need to make those arguments. And they need to make sure that the > discussion is taken to the relevant working groups. The burden should not be > on those who are asking that attention be paid to existing RFCs.
As far as I know, but I'm trying to stay away from the actual proposals and argue this generally, no-one is proposing to update the RFC8200 header insertion text. What people are proposing are for specific domains. And given that, I believe people need to argue the technical merits of those specific proposals. As opposed to throwing the "law book" around. Best regards, Ole _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
