On 5/9/19 17:28, Robert Raszuk wrote: > > > 3) Now there's at least one I-D in spring that ignores RFC8200, and > proposes EH-insertion as if it was allowed, essentially circumventing > RFC8200, and IETF consensus. > > > Incorrect. RFC8200 makes it black on white clear that insertion, > deletion and mangling is allowed in IPv6 if destination is yourself in > the packet's IPv6 outer header.
You only get to create EHs if you are sourcing the packets. Period. Either you are sourcing packets -- and hence you are not doing insertion --, or you are not sourcing the packets, and hence are doing insertion. And EH insertion is prohibited by RFC8200. -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
