On 5/9/19 18:42, Alexander Vainshtein wrote: > Fernando, > > With regard to the last statement in your email "If you create a new > packet, and you put your own address in the SA of the packet, and > encapsulate what you received in the IPv6 payload, you're free to > generate as many EHs as you wish", do you see the need to comply with > the 8200 recommendation that says > > > > <quote> > > Each extension header should occur at most once, except for the > > Destination Options header, which should occur at most twice (once > > before a Routing header and once before the upper-layer header). > > <end quote>
Of course. I was mostly meaning that if you encapsulate, then the resulting packet can contain an EH, because you'd not be *inserting* and EH in an existing packet, but rather creating a brand new one. Of course, the rest of RFC8200 still applies. -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
