Even if you remove the reference – you still have problems in 4.13 and 4.21 which manipulate the headers.
I also point out that it’s rather hard to argue that headers aren’t being inserted when the network programming draft is explicitly mentioned as a normative reference for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-srv6-extensions-02 in section 4.3, and in there, it specifies a type to specify the maximum number of SID’s to be inserted as part of the T.insert behavior – as per section 5.2 – which explicitly refers to inserting SRH in transit. Andrew From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Robert Raszuk Sent: Thursday, 5 September 2019 22:24 To: Fernando Gont <fg...@si6networks.com> Cc: 6man WG <i...@ietf.org>; Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petre...@gmail.com>; Robert Raszuk <rras...@gmail.com>; spring@ietf.org Subject: Re: [spring] Spirit and Letter of the Law (was: Question about SRv6 Insert function) * draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming has a normative reference to draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion * draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion is about EH insertion * EH insertion is forbidden by RFC8200 We have wasted way too much time and energy with all the methafores and curious interpretations of standards by folks pushing and/or supporting EH insertion, really. Please notice that version -00 which was accepted by the WG does not have such normative reference. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-00<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming-00> It is not even listed as informative reference. So it can be removed tomorrow if it bothers you :) Cheers, R.
_______________________________________________ spring mailing list spring@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
