So that I will know whether I am allowed to reply.
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
-----Original Message-----
From: Ole Troan <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2020 12:22 PM
To: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>
Cc: Sander Steffann <[email protected]>; Robert Raszuk <[email protected]>;
[email protected]; 6man <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ketan Talaulikar
(ketant) <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in CRH
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
> On 25 May 2020, at 17:49, Ron Bonica <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Ole,
>
> When commenting on list, could you indicate whether hats are on or off?
And that is important to you for this particular message because?
> Juniper Business Use Only
Ole
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 25, 2020 6:31 AM
> To: Sander Steffann <[email protected]>
> Cc: Robert Raszuk <[email protected]>; Ron Bonica <[email protected]>;
> [email protected]; 6man <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Ketan Talaulikar
> (ketant) <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [spring] CRH is back to the SPRING Use-Case - Re: Size of CR in
> CRH
>
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
>
>
> Sander,
>
>>> Your below list looks like custom made set of RFP requirements to eliminate
>>> any other vendor or any other solution to solve the problem at hand rather
>>> then rational list of requirements.
>>
>> My main customer (an ISP in NL) would fit exactly in the list that Ron sent.
>> They want a simple solution that they can understand and manage, that works
>> over IPv6. Whether the path will include many nodes (>8) is not known at
>> this point, but they want something that can support it in the future.
>>
>> So the list of requirements isn't that strange.
>
> That CRH is simple is a bit like claiming that MPLS is simple just because
> the header has few fields.
> I think you would be hard pressed to substantiate that any solution here is
> particularly simpler than any other. But you are welcome to try.
>
> Everyone claims to want a simple solution, funnily enough the end result is
> usually the opposite. The words "simple" and "source routing" are oxymorons.
> Let's leave the marketing out of this.
>
> Ole
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
