Hi Everyone,
It seems that the core value of segment routing is stateless (in the core
of a network). The document defines a new type of segment for Segment Routing
[RFC8402], called Replication segment. Using Replication segment is not
stateless. This is not consistent with the core value of segment routing. I
oppose the progress of the document.
Best Regards,
Huaimo
________________________________
From: spring <spring-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of James Guichard
<james.n.guich...@futurewei.com>
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2022 10:10 AM
To: SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>
Cc: spring-cha...@ietf.org <spring-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment
Dear WG:
This email starts a 2-week Working Group Last Call for
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-spring-sr-replication-segment%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chuaimo.chen%40futurewei.com%7C385b4881095c41b2c27008dad152b258%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638052450396258660%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Xc85avPl8dZMqGuCSXAA6f89OTvRfQfQ6MGa9NCQnBE%3D&reserved=0>
Please read the updated document if you haven’t already and send your comments
to the SPRING WG list no later than December 12th 2022.
If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the
mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.
Lastly, if you are an author or contributor please respond to indicate whether
you know of any undisclosed IPR related to this document.
Thanks!
Jim, Joel & Bruno
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
