Great idea George! Here is another thought, why not award the project to the bidder that uses the most confusing, highly technical non-sense language, that is totally meaningless. That way a contractor that is still using an old Rotary Feedback Rewinder, will loose out to one using a Flux Capacitor. Its MLK day here in PHX and all the AHJ's are off enjoying life on the other side!! Mark at Aero
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of George Church Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 10:40 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: max velocity Well, if you have "smart water" it knows to reduce speed to the contracted design criteria. Otherwise, it flows from areas of higher pressure to areas of lower pressure following the rules of fluid mechanics. I had another thought on this velocity thing. Instead of picking the lowest responsible bidder based on price, why not award projects on the responsible bid based on lowest estimated velocity ? Glc It's a Monday full of AHJ and A/E interfaces..... :( -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phelps, Mark Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 12:15 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: max velocity One (maybe) last question on the velocity issue. Once the "engineering" is completed, and the pipe sizes and demand area have been determined, with the required safety factor of 10 PSI or 10%, whichever is most inconvenient, what do y'all think happens to the "calculated velocity" in the pipes when the reality pressure acts on the system? Mark at Aero _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
