Check the exception - in a sprinklered building a "Class III" isn't really.   
The tendency in code development has been to reassess whether it's in 
everyone's interest (fire service, building owners, tenants and guests) to keep 
an attractive nuisance like a hose cabinet in the code.   Current life safety 
and egress training practices are to encourage everyone to leave the building 
when an alarm sounds and that's tough enough right there.   We don't want 
Wannabe Superhero Guy rushing toward the fire with a hose in his hand that will 
likely knock him (or her) on their butt.    In a sprinklered building the 
intent is to provide the reducer so that small hose can be connected as easily 
as a larger one - it's largely symbolic you could say.    But the hose is 
furnished by responders (these days they're worn as backpacks).

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting

The foregoing is the opinion of the writer alone, and does not necessarily 
represent the intent of the NFPA 14 Technical Committee, nor constitute a 
formal or informal interpretation of the standard.




-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Pinigis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:17 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: NFPA #14 and pressures

Most jurisdictions that I have worked in do not want the 1 1/2" hose installed, 
and the building codes (IBC) do not require hoses. I was wondering why this is 
a class III standpipe to begin with.  

Paul J. Pinigis, P.E.
Chief Life Safety Engineer


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy W Goins
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: NFPA #14 and pressures

If providing 1½" reducers it is assumed that 1½" hoses be provided. Most FD do 
not use 1½" hoses to fight fires, they are for clean-up and untrained persons. 
If there aren't any hoses then why provide the 1½" reducers?

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Pinigis
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 2:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: NFPA #14 and pressures


One thing that does not make sense....where are these untrained people going to 
get 1 1/2" hose?  

Paul J. Pinigis, P.E.
Chief Life Safety Engineer

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy W Goins
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 3:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: NFPA #14 and pressures

Must meet both criteria. The 1½" hose station is available for untrained 
persons thus the pressure limit.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: NFPA #14 and pressures


NFPA #14 states that when the static pressure at a hose connection exceeds
175 psi, a pressure regulating device shall be provided to limit the pressure 
to 100 psi for 1 ½" hose connections and to 175 psi for all other hose 
connections.

 

What if the standpipe is a Class III utilizing the fully sprinklered building 
exception allowing 2 ½" hose valves with 1 ½" reducers, caps and chains?

 

Does the pressure need to be limited to 100 psi or 175 psi?

 

 

Dave

 

 

David K. Thompson

Vice President

Allstate Fire Sprinkler, Inc.

P.O. Box 2350

Hartford, CT  06146

Phone = 860-246-7711

Fax = 860-246-7707

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
****************************************************************************
******************
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
They
are intended for the named recipient(s) only.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager or 
the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make copies

thereof.
****************************************************************************
******************

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
**********************************************************************************************
IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. 
They are intended for the named recipient(s) only.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the system manager or 
the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make 
copies thereof.
**********************************************************************************************

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to