slow down cause you are running down the wrong path. You are taking pieces of general information such as a 40 ft span and making part of the determination. The span has nothing to do with the length of the channel, ie joist span 40 ft to a beam then another span etc etc.

The real question is how well does solid purlins on 4 ft centers comply with the DEFINITION (3.7.2) for unobstructed? Easy answer since it doesn't. This is obstructed construction.

The morale of the story is start with the definitions before jumping to the examples.

Roland



On Oct 18, 2007, at 2:51 PM, A.P.Silva wrote:

Okay, compare beam/purlins with wood joist construction. The wood joist spacing is closer than the purlin spacing. But there is a restriction of 40 feet for the span. If the span was more than 40 feet, it is not obstructed construction. So clearly the "box" effect has to be considered. In the case
of beam/purlins, there is no box. So UNOBSTRUCTED CONSTRUCTION.

Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Vance
Sent: October 18, 2007 2:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: purlins

As a follow up, here is an informal interpretation from NFSA on this type of
issue from the March 13th E-Tech Alert.

Question 3 - Beam and Girder Pocket Limitations for Obstructed Construction

In NFPA 13 (annex section A.3.7.1(1) in the 2002 edition), the definition of beam and girder construction as a type of Obstructed Construction calls for "beams spaced 3 ft to 7-½ ft on center". However the definition does not provide a maximum square footage for the beam and girder pocket. We have a building that has steel I-beams spaced 7'-6" apart but these beams sit on larger trusses, thus creating an air gap above the two ends above the truss.
This being said, can we consider this Obstructed Construction?

Answer: Yes. As described, the trusses are perpendicular to the beams and provide their support. If the tops of the beams are at the ceiling and the trusses are below then the beams should be considered the primary ceiling structure. The sprinklers' ability to collect heat and distribute a spray pattern is going to be affected most by the structural members directly below the ceiling. As you have noted, beam type construction spaced 3 to 7.5 feet on center is obstructed construction. There is no requirement that
the beams frame into the trusses or that a maximum size of pocket be
provided. The location of the trusses with regard to sprinkler spacing must be considered so that they do not create obstructions to sprinkler discharge
patterns.

In older editions of NFPA 13, beams that framed into other beams to form pockets less than 300 sq. ft. were given special consideration as "panel construction". Sprinklers were permitted to be placed further below the ceiling due to the greater capacity of panel construction to bank heat.
While this type of construction is still defined in annex section
A.3.7.1(4), there is no allowance for greater sprinkler deflector distances
below the ceiling. This annex section can be used, however, to justify
obstructed construct ion deflector distances even where members are spaced more than 7.5 ft on center provided the ceiling pocket criteria is met. This
can be useful in situations where there are multiple adjacent ceiling
pockets.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Vance
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: purlins

To All:

The proper definition, in my humble opinion is still beam and girder
construction, therefore obstructed contruction.

Girder, by definition, is "a strong horizontal beam used as a main support inside a building" ie, the support beam system (girder) on which the purlins
sit.
There are no length nor volume limitations imposed by NFPA on this type of construction, nor does it classify any type of "panel" configuration be
maintained.
The determining factor is that the SPACING between the purlins "framed into
or on" the girder must be between 3 ft to 7 1/2 ft on center.

If the beam/purlin spacing exceeds 7 1/2 ft on center, then you can still
classify it as PANEL construction, provided the 300 sq.ft. "panel"
limitation is met.

With typical purlin depths of 8" to 10", the following scenarios tend to
play out:

(1) If you classify it as unobstructed, your deflector distance will be 1"
to 12" below the deck or insulation (with standard spray sprinklers).
(2) If the purlins are 12" in depth, you can still install the sprinklers
with the deflectors even with the bottom of the purlin and meet the
deflector and obstruction rules.
(3) If you classify it as obstructed, your deflector will be 1" to 6"
below the purlins not to exceed 22" below the deck or insulation.
(4) Or you can install the sprinklers with the deflector even with the
bottom of the purlins and meet the deflector and obstruction rules.
(5) If ESFR sprinklers are considered, then your main concern is if the purlins are more than 12" deep, you must install ESFR's in every bay formed
by the purlins.

As to the "open space" formed by the purlins sitting on the girder, the volume of opening created at each end of the span will not typically create a large enough concern to warrant a change in the construction definiton, in
my opinion.

I would think that NFPA would have given direction on this if it was of a
major concern.

Thanks,

Ray Vance
Chief Engineering Tech.
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
www.waynefire.com






-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg McGahan
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 3:07 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: purlins

Based on what? It clearly does not fall into panel construction due to the
space above the beam. They are not girders.

I am not fighting for or against, I just would like a conclusive answer.

Is there not a manufacturer or committee member there that could enlighten us? I would think that the tests run on these storage heads and such would
have forced a definition for the manufacturers.

Greg

Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
Fax: 850-937-1852


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
- FPDC
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: purlins

Up here, it usually goes beams, purlins above (on) the beams, steel deck on the purlins. The insulation goes in between the purlins. Is the insulation going on the metal deck roof?If the insulation comes to the bottom of the
purlin, it will create a fairly flat ceiling and I would consider it
unobstructed. If there is no insulation, I would think it would be
considered obstructed.


At 02:51 PM 10/18/2007, you wrote:
No, above them.  A typical warehouse.

Living Water Fire Protection, LLC
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
Fax: 850-937-1852


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Todd
Williams
- FPDC
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 1:50 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: purlins

Is there insulation between the purlins?


At 02:45 PM 10/18/2007, you wrote:
Poll:

Are typical 8" and 10" purlins spaced 4-5' apart with open space
above the beams where the purlins rest considered OBstructed or
Unobstructed construction?



Living Water Fire Protection, LLC

1160 McKenzie Road

Cantonment, FL 32533

850-937-1850

Fax: 850-937-1852



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, Connecticut
www.fpdc.com
860.535.2080
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, Connecticut
www.fpdc.com
860.535.2080
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
2006 Inductee into "The Players Hall of Fame"
at The Great Games of Business
Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers, Inc. "Best Places to Work"
Rated #1 in 2006
Large Business Category
by Orlando Business Journal
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to