www.amtrol.com/firextrolwhatsnew.htm

Link to their UL Product Line

Mike Cabral

---- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
>  
> Amtrol does NOT manufacture an expansion tank listed for fire  protection 
> use. The Standard requires a LISTED expansion tank.
> Young Engineering is the only company currently manufacturing expansion  
> tanks listed for fire protection use.
>  
> Forest Wilson
> Cherokee Fire
>  
>  
>  
>  
> In a message dated 10/25/2007 6:33:20 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> I would  suggest you consider Amtrol's Fire-X expansion chamber, I found them
> to be  a bit cheaper, they assist with sizing (glycerin's expansion is much
> less  than a glycol-water mix so the chamber size is smaller than glycol)  and
> will send you the selection paperwork and sizing help.  I asked  about
> software and was told "soon".  It was a benefit for me that they  were in New
> England (RI) too.
> Build a closet, insulate it and heat  it.
> 
> Funny you mention mid-landings.  We started doing them as  well, more for
> liability reasons.  We also do Bathrooms if they have  any in their Basement.
> We're seeing a trend for a half bath in many single  and multi residential
> projects lately, and garages under the living areas  in part of the Basement
> or stepped up, attached.  I just do a 2 or 4  head calc (if they have that
> many) on the dry heads for the  garage.
> 
> Tom
> GRS
> 
> 
> Not to mention a listed expansion  chamber. Which in some cases is the most
> expensive part of the  equation.
> 
> Richard L. Mote CET
> Designer
> Rowe Sprinkler Systems,  Inc
> 
> >
> > NEW Question:
> > Our practice has always been to  protect under stair mid-landings in 13D.
> > There is no specific  requirement to do this but we have always felt the
> > this is protection  for the "Main Route of Egress" which only makes sense
> > if your entire  system is only to provide enough time for the occupants to
> > safely  leave the home. What have others been doing and why?
> >
> > Thom  McMahon
> >
> >
> > I assume that these systems are not CPVC since  CPVC is incompatible with
> > most antifreeze.
> >
> > Paul J.  Pinigis, P.E.
> > Chief Life Safety Engineer
> >
> >
> > We  have been asked to convert many (100+) existing 13-R systems to
> >  anti-freeze. The valve groups are
> > installed in unheated garages (with  heat tape) but the garages are
> > sprinklered and freeze
> >  occasionally. Garages cannot be isolated for dry sidewalls due to
> >  configuration. All homes are owned
> > by a single  company.
> >
> > My basic question: Is this a good idea? Wouldn't it  be cheaper in both
> > the long and short run to heat
> > garages to  40+ F? These are in the NE USA but below the Mason Dixon
> > line.  Comments welcome.
> >
> >
> > Burton  Ford
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum  mailing  list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> To  Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put  the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to