I won't argue with your post, I totally agree, but had more than one water 
department that would not under any circumstances permit AF of any flavor to be 
used in a sprinkler system.  Believe me I tried to argue the point but to no 
avail. So its always better to double check before making the assumption.  You 
just never know what bright idea someone may have come up with.  

Besides, abuse of AF may cause global warming, the impending ice age and 
mis-alignment of the planets, you wouldn't want to be responsible for all that 
would ya?


Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

"Careful with the AF, not all jurisdictions permit its use."  I won't argue the 
logical correctness of your statement because it would only take one for you to 
be right. 

They may say they don't permit but it's probably not legal to not permit.
With an RPZ and/or food grade AF they are on thin ground legally.  You have 
industrial processes with things much worse than AF.  Read some ingredients 
lists it's a food additive.  Quick survey in the office I find glycerin in my 
Girl Scout Samoa's and in a pound cake.  True I wouldn't drink it straight 
either but it's not that bad of stuff. 

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
[email protected]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

Careful with the AF, not all jurisdictions permit its use. Check first with 
health department, water purveyor and if the nursing home is a State facility, 
check with that agency as well.  

13R puts nursing homes into Light Hazard and allows dry pipe systems but takes 
you back to NFPA 13 when AF, Dry and PA systems are installed.  (13R, 2007, 
5.3.3.)  So with that, you then play by NFPA 13 rules for calcs, heads, 
installation, etc.  As LH occupancy you could use residential heads or QR for 
new installations (NFPA 13, 2007, 8.3.3), QR per 13, 2007,
3.6.2.9, Res. per 8.4.5 where listed for dry systems.   

So it makes sense for the system to have been specified as being per NFPA 13 
instead of 13R.  


Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

Anti-freeze makes the problem/question moot.  In most ways AF IMHO is 
better/easier/less risk.  Only down side is when you have to drain for
whatever reason but that's manageable.    

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thom McMahon
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

I believe that most "Nursing Homes" fall under light hazard, not residential. 
This is significant with dry systems since the water delivery time is very 
different.

Table 7.2.3.6.1 Dry System Water Delivery Hazard Number of Most Remote 
Sprinklers Initially Open Maximum Time of Water Delivery

Residential 1head 15 seconds
Light 1head 60 seconds
Ordinary I 2heads 50 seconds
Ordinary II 2heads 50 seconds
Extra I 4heads 45 seconds
Extra II 4heads 45 seconds
High piled 4heads 40 seconds

Thom McMahon, SET


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
Willis
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 8:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

I believe you still must use residential sprinklers IF it is residential. I do 
not know of any listed for dry use. You may have to cover the pipe and use 
listed attic sprinklers to protect any CPVC and the like, and run it wet.

R/
Matt

 
Matthew J. Willis
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-387-1163 Facsimile
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Tiroly
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

The top floor residential suits are supplied by the dry system in the attic.
My main question - does the time delay compromise the life safety of the 
elderly housing residential occupants?

Arthur Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection Design
Tiroly and Associates
3300 King Ave
Cleveland, OH 44114
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 cell


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
Willis
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

The dry system in the attic falls under 13, 13R allows the omission. If 13 is 
specified, that may be the reason why. I have seen and done it in nursing 
homes. Also you will see this in 4 story and under hotel/motels depending on 
owner.

R/
Matt


Matthew J. Willis
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-387-1163 Facsimile
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Tiroly
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

It is my understanding that sprinklers in an elderly housing assisted living 
apartment facility is primarily life safety.

Can a large dry system installed in an attic with the usual time delays of 
water delivered to the end head compromise the life safety aspect of the 
sprinkler system?
The attic has 2 large air handlers with gas fired heating + AC and is fully 
sprinklered but considered unheated.

It is just 2 stories and 13R could be used but 13 is specified. Is the dry 
system acceptable for life safety?

Arthur Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection Design
Tiroly and Associates
3300 King Ave
Cleveland, OH 44114
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 cell


_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to