"Careful with the AF, not all jurisdictions permit its use."  I won't argue
the logical correctness of your statement because it would only take one for
you to be right. 

They may say they don't permit but it's probably not legal to not permit.
With an RPZ and/or food grade AF they are on thin ground legally.  You have
industrial processes with things much worse than AF.  Read some ingredients
lists it's a food additive.  Quick survey in the office I find glycerin in
my Girl Scout Samoa's and in a pound cake.  True I wouldn't drink it
straight either but it's not that bad of stuff. 

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:08 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

Careful with the AF, not all jurisdictions permit its use. Check first with
health department, water purveyor and if the nursing home is a State
facility, check with that agency as well.  

13R puts nursing homes into Light Hazard and allows dry pipe systems but
takes you back to NFPA 13 when AF, Dry and PA systems are installed.  (13R,
2007, 5.3.3.)  So with that, you then play by NFPA 13 rules for calcs,
heads, installation, etc.  As LH occupancy you could use residential heads
or QR for new installations (NFPA 13, 2007, 8.3.3), QR per 13, 2007,
3.6.2.9, Res. per 8.4.5 where listed for dry systems.   

So it makes sense for the system to have been specified as being per NFPA 13
instead of 13R.  


Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 11:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

Anti-freeze makes the problem/question moot.  In most ways AF IMHO is
better/easier/less risk.  Only down side is when you have to drain for
whatever reason but that's manageable.    

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thom McMahon
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

I believe that most "Nursing Homes" fall under light hazard, not
residential. This is significant with dry systems since the water delivery
time is very different.

Table 7.2.3.6.1 Dry System Water Delivery Hazard Number of Most Remote
Sprinklers Initially Open Maximum Time of Water Delivery

Residential 1head 15 seconds
Light 1head 60 seconds
Ordinary I 2heads 50 seconds
Ordinary II 2heads 50 seconds
Extra I 4heads 45 seconds
Extra II 4heads 45 seconds
High piled 4heads 40 seconds

Thom McMahon, SET


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
Willis
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 8:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

I believe you still must use residential sprinklers IF it is residential. I
do not know of any listed for dry use. You may have to cover the pipe and
use listed attic sprinklers to protect any CPVC and the like, and run it
wet.

R/
Matt

 
Matthew J. Willis
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-387-1163 Facsimile
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Tiroly
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

The top floor residential suits are supplied by the dry system in the attic.
My main question - does the time delay compromise the life safety of the
elderly housing residential occupants?

Arthur Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection Design
Tiroly and Associates
3300 King Ave
Cleveland, OH 44114
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 cell


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthew J.
Willis
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

The dry system in the attic falls under 13, 13R allows the omission. If 13
is specified, that may be the reason why. I have seen and done it in nursing
homes. Also you will see this in 4 story and under hotel/motels depending on
owner.

R/
Matt


Matthew J. Willis
Norred Fire Systems L.L.C.
318-387-1134 Voice
318-387-1163 Facsimile
[email protected]
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Tiroly
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: RESIDENTIAL OCCOPANCY DRY SYSTEM

It is my understanding that sprinklers in an elderly housing assisted living
apartment facility is primarily life safety.

Can a large dry system installed in an attic with the usual time delays of
water delivered to the end head compromise the life safety aspect of the
sprinkler system?
The attic has 2 large air handlers with gas fired heating + AC and is fully
sprinklered but considered unheated.

It is just 2 stories and 13R could be used but 13 is specified. Is the dry
system acceptable for life safety?

Arthur Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection Design
Tiroly and Associates
3300 King Ave
Cleveland, OH 44114
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 cell


_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to