Yeah but that makes sense since they are used in potable water systems and potable systems connected to sprinklers. That is not unique to sprinklers specifically.
Craig L. Prahl, CET Fire Protection Specialist Mechanical Department CH2MHILL Lockwood Greene 1500 International Drive PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - 864.599.8439 [email protected] http://www.ch2m.com -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd Williams Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 10:48 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: IMC, IPC and nail plates If I recall, the IPC has been used in the DCVA vs. RPZ debate.... At 10:19 AM 4/17/2009, you wrote: >What's the difference in requirements between the IPC, IMC and what you >have to do for sprinklers? > >Can't see how he could stretch those codes to cover sprinklers since >they are obviously controlled via IFC and NFPA. I'd say he's grasping >for straws. > >But it would seem that the requirement for a potable water line would >be no greater than for a sprinkler line, right? > > >Craig L. Prahl, CET >Fire Protection Specialist >Mechanical Department >CH2MHILL >Lockwood Greene >1500 International Drive >PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC 29304-0491 Direct - 864.599.4102 Fax - >864.599.8439 [email protected] http://www.ch2m.com > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of George Church >Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 9:59 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: IMC, IPC and nail plates > >Had an interesting encounter with an AHJ this week. >He stopped by a jobsite where we're installing CPVC in walls, and >found fault with the nail plates we're using. >I called to follow up on why he didn't like them, and asked for a >code reference. He replied even if it wasn't in the code, he'd >enforce nailplates extending further than ours as a safety issue. So >I reminded him that his authority was to enforce the PA UCC as >adopted, not safety issues he took a personal liking to. > >His code reference arrived by USPS this AM. He cited the IPC and IMC >as applicable to sprinkler piping, which I disagree with. > >Any thoughts or previous rulings by other AHJs? > >George Church >Rowe Sprinkler > >_______________________________________________ >Sprinklerforum mailing list >http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > >To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) >_______________________________________________ >Sprinklerforum mailing list >http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum >For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] > >To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] >(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) Todd G. Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, Connecticut www.fpdc.com 860.535.2080 _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
