So 18 tanks of 15,000 gallons each?

Regardless, if you're under the IBC you're limited to only 240 gallons in the 
building before the building classification is considered H-2 or H-3 depending 
on what the particular chemicals are.

Get to that point and you're in a whole new world of building issues protection 
of structure (passive fire prot), ventilation, electrical classification, 
definitely containment regardless of occupancy classification, and on and on.

You've got potential for two scenarios, pool fire and 3D fire.  

If you look at the MSDS it should say to use suppression method for surrounding 
area or to use something specific such as foam or foam-water.

You've got more to look at that needs answered than what is here before making 
a final decision.



Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection Specialist
Mechanical Department
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
PO Box 491, Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
[email protected]
http://www.ch2m.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 4:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Class IB & IC Water Miscible

Class IB & IC Water Miscible - Think liquor

 

Stationary tanks - 15,000 gallons each, 18 within containment area inside a 
building.  Think one hell of a party.  

 

Got a code reference to a sprinkler density/protection scheme?  FM 7-29 
references a 7-88 but I can't find any 7-88.  NFPA 30 (24.6) doesn't seem to 
say anything much about this even suggesting it's OK with none (after a hazard 
analysis, of course).  If the goal is to keep a fire not involving the liquid 
from breaking a tank probably don't need much density.  If the goal is to save 
anything after a tank rupture and fire then foam is probably
the only answer.  I'd think the code or standard would say something?   Most
of the building is drums in racks so I think were at .6/3000 plus in-racks.
Thinking just extending into this small area has very little cost.  

 

Yes, yes I know PE should be involved to specify the approach for the holistic 
fire protection matters including spill containment, venting, tank 
specifications, electrical concerns etc.  Lets for now assume this is the
real ugly world and this party doesn't exist yet.   

 

Chris Cahill, P.E.

Fire Protection Engineer

Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.

 

763-658-4483

763-658-4921 fax

 

Email: [email protected]

 

Mail: P.O. Box 69

        Waverly, MN 55390

 

Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW

              Waverly, MN 55390

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to