Justin,

Once again it's the rules. Less than 55 sqft no head, more than 55
sqft then a head. Separate a compartment (don't worry about what rooms
are called, worry about there function--I can call a 50 sqft walk-in
closet a bathroom but with closet poles and no bathroom fixtures it's
ain't a bathroom) with an 8" lintel and it's two compartments. If the
compartment happens to be a 56 sqft bathroom then it becomes two
bathrooms less than 55 sqft. Separate it with a full height door and
it doesn't. Now about the engineering.... Prescriptive codes are
compromises designed to cover the most common situations the most
often. I know you know this but we all get caught up in some
complexity far too often and forget that simple fact. Just a reminder
that the rules be the rules and that's all. Remember that it's illegal
to carry a concealed sword over six feet long in Seattle. 5'' 11" is
OK. Still doesn't make a lot of sense.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Sprinkler Forum<[email protected]> wrote:
> Residential highrise. The door goes full height (maybe half inch
> clearance on the top). The frame is recessed in the hard lid ceiling.
>
> Your take is that without the lintel, the bathroom is part of the
> larger bathroom it is connected to and since the aggregate of that
> area is over 55 sf that the head must be included. In the small
> bathroom.
>
> But, do you agree that the 8 inch lintel is a detriment if you
> consider a fire in the bathroom?
>
> Since we should not even consider a fire in the bathroom( low
> probability, size etc. ) then the question is... does the absence of
> the lintel hinder the activation of heads when we consider a fire in
> the adjoining space? This could be due to the additional volume of the
> 55sf bathroom needing to fill and may slightly delay the operation of
> the heads in the sprinklered space. I would guess that due to the
> small volume of the non-sprinklered space that the delay would be small.
>
> I think I will have to do some fire modeling to make this point to our
> inspector. I will share the results when complete.
>
> Thanks for all of the input.
>
> Justin D. Reid, P.E.
> RLH Fire Protection
> 16735 Saticoy St. #110
> Van Nuys, CA 91406
> 213-798-0251
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 11, 2009, at 10:33 AM, "Dave Phelan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Sorry - meant to add one other item ....
>>
>> Not knowing the occupancy of the building but sounds like
>> residential - the
>> bathroom exception applies within the dwelling unit.  Does this
>> lintel-less
>> space open into a public corridor or public area?  Wouldn't we be
>> suppressing this public bathroom then anyway ?
>>
>> If it is single family 13D type system then I might be more inclined
>> to
>> allow the head to be omitted under the 55Ft2 rule - is there some
>> technical
>> difficulty with providing a lintel - even decorative- anyway?  I can't
>> imagine this door is a full height frameless clear glass door but
>> then again
>> I don't know much about architecture !!
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:Sprinklerforum-
>> [email protected]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>



-- 
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering
Bates Technical College
Tacoma, WA

Member:
SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA AFAA
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to