And I've seen where your firm does windows, too.
At last AFSA-San Diego hotel, creatively.

Must have been nice to have a showcase jobsite right out the window, right
behind the picketers. 

glc

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 12:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: draft line from suction tank.

We use multiple fill valves sized to recover at a much higher rate, so
overflow is an issue in a fail-open scenario.   We usually route the
overflow (which may be 6" or 8" or 10" depending on fill rate, which is
tied to demand rate) out of the pump room and onto the floor pointed in
the direction of the pitch to the sump.   While the sump certainly won't
eject the overflow at 1:1 (not even close, even with a double), the area
of most parking garages is such that even a high rate of overflow isn't
all that intrusive in case of flooding.   3" of water in a 15,000 s.f.
area is 28,000 gallons - not a token but if we curb the pump room, there
generally isn't much else at the bottom of the building, so there isn't
any huge impact.  Generally, such a failure is detected and the water
shut off in relatively short order, and we have to consider that in the
life of the building, this could maybe occur once?   It's not an
everyday risk, by any means and part of what our firm does on every
high-rise project is coordinate and manage that flooding risk.

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting
San Diego, CA




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jerry
Costello
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: draft line from suction tank.

Steve I am curious how you handle tank overflow in San Diego for these
below grade tank installations applications.
 In this situation the tank overflow I assume is handled by sump pumps.
Assuming the sump cannot handle the open flow of the fill valve LA
requires the installation of multiple 2" fill valves. LA's reasoning is
that if any single fill valve fails the sump can handle the flow. I am
was wondering if this is common practice.


Jerry M Costello set
Advance Fire Protection
Ph 714-526-2231  Fax 562-691-5482

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve
Leyton
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: draft line from suction tank.

You are correct my ski-bumming amigo.   Because we're in seismic
country, the building code has long required an on-site auxiliary water
supply equal to 30 minutes of sprinkler demand.   Every large metro FD
(i.e. San Francisco, Sacramento, LA and San Diego) has had ordinance in
place for years that stretches the capacity to 30 minutes or more of
standpipe demand, or sprinklers with hose stream whichever is greater;
that's always been the standpipes in my experience.   So with two
standpipes, we store 21,500 usable gallons; for three risers it would be
30K, and so forth.   Since we already have to store a large amount of
water, the common practice has been to pour a cistern-like tank
monolithically with walls and or floors, and that generally is at the
lowest level of a parking basement on grade.  Not always, but usually on
grade.    It being a break tank, we then draft directly from the
reservoir using the pump discharge flange as the "flow test", based on
the pump rating exclusively (no NPSH).

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting
San Diego, CA




-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thom
McMahon
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 7:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: draft line from suction tank.

What I've heard from my SOCAL friends, is that they usually install the
storage in the parking garage as you suggest, but also put the pump down
there, eliminating the "Draft" issue. 
Am I describing this correctly Mr. Leyton?

Thom McMahon, SET
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
P.O. Box 882136
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488
Tel:  970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of R
Richardson
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 7:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: draft line from suction tank.



This issue came up here with respect to secondary water tanks required
for high rise buildings in seismic zones.

There was significant resistance from the "building owner community" for
two main reasons.

Firstly, there is a limit to how much negative draft is feasible, which
results in a prohibition of placing the tanks deep down in the
underground parking, which is where the architects typically desire to
locate the tank.


The second reason for resistance is the fact that the tank requirement
is based on the premise that a seismic event disabled the city water
supply.
The owners were not happy with the possibility that the emergency water
for their fire sprinkler system (plus hose use) would be used for
someone else's building, leaving their building now unprotected. 

We ended up not requiring the draft line.

Probably quite a bit different scenario than what you are involved in,
but something to consider.

Rich Richardson
Seattle Fire Department


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4450 (20090923) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4450 (20090923) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email
to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 4450 (20090923) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to