Thanks, That is what I was looking for. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland Huggins Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 4:34 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ESFR for over 25ft storage
The 960 SF no longer is required (as of the 2010 edition anyways). It was intentionally deleted. FM has never required a minimum size other than whatever is provided by 12 sprinklers at their associated area of coverage. See ROP 13-456. Roland On Mar 26, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Dewayne Martinez wrote: > 2007 also has 64sf. I read a article by Kenneth Isman about ESFR > sprinklers and concrete tees which he staggers the sprinklers to meet > 8ft min between sprinklers. He states that 960 SF still applies but > then I saw the section in Ch16 and was trying to confirm. I have the > question into NFPA also. > Dewayne > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > ParsleyConsulting > Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 2:44 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ESFR for over 25ft storage > _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field) _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
