Did you verify that the owner/ AHJ really wants new calcs? They may be in there 
as part of a canned spec that did not get cut out.

Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP 
Sales Engineer 
Alliance Fire Protection 
*Licensed in KS & MO 

913.888.0647 ph 
913.888.0618 f 
913.927.0222 cell 
www. AFPsprink.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd Williams
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 6:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Hydraulic Calcs 

Are you replacing only the 3" pipe or branch 
lines and heads as well? Was the existing system 
hydraulically calculated or pipe schedule? How old is the system?

Depending on the age of the existing system, new 
hydraulics could open cans of worms. If it is 
pipe schedule, the system has probably never been 
calculated so there is no indication of how the 
hydraulics looked in the first place. If it has 
been calculated, was the 30% increase for dry 
systems, 30% increase for roof slope and the 
new(er) minimum end head pressures included? If 
not, you may not have an adequate system, based 
on current Code. But it may have been fine when 
it was installed. Is there a compelling reason to 
bring this attic up to current Code?

This probably needs to be hashed out between you, 
the Owner, Engineer and AHJ. I hope your quote 
included a provision so you get extra $$ if the 
pipe sizes increase due to the hydraulics.


At 02:10 AM 1/12/2011, you wrote:
>I am bidding on removal and replacement of an 
>existing dry pipe system. This is about 1,000 
>feet of 3 inch. Part of the specification is 
>“Contractor shall submit working plans that 
>have been approved by authorities having 
>jurisdiction, including hydraulic calculations, 
>prior to starting work.” Is it normal to have 
>new calculations done when just replacing 
>rusting pipes?  If so, where do you draw the 
>line at needing new calculations?  There has 
>been  new construction,  since the building was 
>built.  Three new low hazard buildings have been 
>built, with a  new low hazard rehabilitation 
>facility going in a block down the 
>street. 
>_______________________________________________ 
>Sprinklerforum mailing list 
>[email protected] 
>http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum 
>For Technical Assistance, send an email to: 
>[email protected] To Unsubscribe, send 
>an email 
>to:[email protected] (Put 
>the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to