this issue was also looked at at the ROP Meeting (proposal 13-486) and the current position is to accept (there has not yet been an official ballot)

Roland

On Mar 14, 2011, at 1:48 PM, Travis Mack, SET wrote:

Is it my imagination, or did I read somewhere that you are not req'd to include the 2 heads under an obstruction in ESFR calculations with the revised FM criteria. If I was not imagining, where would that be found?

--
Please feel free to call if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
2508 E Lodgepole Drive
Gilbert, AZ 85298
Office (480) 505-9271
Fax (866) 430-6107

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to