If NFPA 1 (2012) is applicable...

4.5.8.2    No existing life safety feature shall be removed or reduced where 
such feature is a requirement for new construction. [ 101 :4.6.12.2]
4.5.8.3    Existing life safety features obvious to the public, if not required 
by the Code, shall be either maintained or removed. [ 101 :4.6.12.3]
4.5.8.4    Existing life safety features that exceed the requirements for new 
buildings shall be permitted to be decreased to those required for new 
buildings. [ 101 :4.6.7.4]
4.5.8.5    Existing life safety features that do not meet the requirements for 
new buildings, but that exceed the requirements for existing buildings, shall 
not be further diminished. [ 101 :4.6.7.5]


Duane Johnson, PE
Program Manager
Division of the Fire Marshal (Contractor)
Office of Research Services 
National Institutes of Health 
301-496-0487

"Protecting Science - One Sprinkler at a Time"


-----Original Message-----
From: rongreenman . [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 9:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Interstitial Space Sprinklers

Richard hit it with, "Any device that has the physical appearance of life 
safety or fire protection equipment...." This is the key. Unused stuff that 
isn't life safety in appearance need not be removed if non-functional, but if 
life safety it has to come out or, as Todd said, needs to be in full 
compliance, whether required or not. So if it's life safety stuff and not 
required it can stay or go as long as it works properly, but if out of 
compliance it must be right or it must go.


On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Todd Williams <[email protected]> wrote:

> Then you would have to make it right or take it out. If a system is 
> installed, it has to be per code, whether it is required or not
>
> Todd G Williams, PE
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> Stonington, CT
> 860-535-2080
> www.fpdc.com
>
>
> > On Feb 27, 2014, at 4:46 PM, Steven Cook <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Depending on placement of the full height walls, it is possible some 
> > of
> these existing heads could now be positioned as exceeding the maximum 
> distance from walls.....
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd - 
> Work
> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 4:44 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Interstitial Space Sprinklers
> >
> > However, if the upright sprinklers are still connected and 
> > operational,
> why wold they need to be taken out? If some of the existing heads are 
> removed and the outlets used as drops (without installing new 
> uprights), then all of the uprights in that area should be removed.
> >
> > Todd G Williams, PE
> > Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> > Stonington, CT
> > www.fpdc.com
> > 860-535-2080 (ofc)
> >
> >> On Feb 27, 2014, at 4:35 PM, Richard Lindner 
> >> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Based on prior discussions here, this is a cited reference (IFC 
> >> 2012
> >> 901.4.5) if applicable.
> >>
> >> "Any device that has the physical appearance of life safety or fire 
> >> protection equipment but that does not perform that life safety or 
> >> fire protection function shall be prohibited"
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Steven Cook 
> >>> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We have a fit-out project of an existing core / shell condition
> building.
> >>> Beam and girder construction, all noncombustible.  Existing 
> >>> sprinkler coverage is average 10 x 12 spacing for the open space.
> >>> Accounting for beam and other MEP obstructions as required, etc.  
> >>> The contract drawings are depicting new branch line piping 
> >>> supplying the
> sprinklers at the ACT
> >>> ceilings.   Deck at 15 feet, new ceilings range from 8'6" to 10 feet.
>  They
> >>> currently depict the existing upright heads to remain.
> >>>
> >>> I believe the existing heads are 165 F, but need to verify.  It's 
> >>> the ground floor of a multi-story building (so not at an 
> >>> un-insulated
> roof).
> >>>
> >>> Although the heads are not required, is there a requirement to 
> >>> remove
> the
> >>> existing upright heads?   I thought there was, but didn't locate it.
> >>> Pushing to remove them, but want to have back-up when told to "prove"
> >>> they need to come out.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Steve Cook
> >>> TG Gallagher
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>>
> >>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespr
> >>> ink
> >>> ler.org
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> >> nkl
> >> er.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>



--
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon, 
essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)

A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering, inventor 
and engineer (1876-1958) _______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to