some great answers. Mine was going to be BECAUSE It seems like once something makes it into a standard, it takes an act of congress to get it out (and sine congress isn’t doing much I guess it’ll never happen). It’s never been questioned (that I can remember) in the 18 yrs that I’ve been on the committee. It’s mainly there to show it can be used in other than the normally acceptable manner. We did the same with sidewall sprinklers under the edge of a overhead door. That doesn’t answer the question why not use a dry side wall?
I’ve added it to my list of items for the 2019 cycle. So don’t hold your breath for a quick answer unless you can accept ‘cause. Roland Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering American Fire Sprinkler Assn. --- Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives Dallas, TX http://www.firesprinkler.org On Apr 10, 2014, at 1:37 PM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]> wrote: > Anyone out there, committee members or clairvoyants, who can say why > this illustration shows a dry-pendent sprinkler in what appears to be a > non-conforming orientation? > > Thanks, > SML > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
