Nope.


On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 9:56 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Battlefield earth?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of rongreenman .
> Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 9:42 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: fume hood / dust collector - sprinklers in?
>
> Brad, I had an AHJ like that: sprinklers are better than no sprinklers
> always make a customer sprinkler a building that contained a 1000F degree
> molten salt bath process. even though the manufacturer said that water and
> molten salt don't mix. The AHJ's solution was to shield the machine from
> the sprinklers. That comprised a $37,000.00 hood that left about three feet
> of floor on either side, and eight feet at the ends protected by the
> sprinklers. The machine itself had four levels of redundancy against
> thermostat failure and each thermostat was an electronic device that
> reported it's condition to a central processor that was also in a fail-safe
> mode. harder to get the thing to turn on than to shut down. "Stupid, stupid
> rat creatures." A beer to the first one that can name the reference for the
> quoted materials (without using the internet).
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Just throw some heads in there like you knew they were required. If
> > Woodrow Call was the AHJ he might say "better to have heads and not
> > need them than to need them and not have them"
> >
> > > On Sep 8, 2014, at 8:56 AM, "Bill Brooks"
> > > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Another case of the difference between "when required" and "how to
> > > do
> > it".  The International Mechanical Code (2012) Sections 510 (Hazardous
> > Exhaust Systems) and Section 511 (Dust, Stock and Refuse Conveying
> > Systems) provide guidance on this.  Again, it shouldn't be up to a
> > sprinkler contractor to figure out whether sprinklers should be
> > installed but only to install per the appropriate standard.  As with
> > most of these issues, we don't know if there is a design professional
> > on this job or whether your regular customer has just installed a new
> > process and has called you to do what's required.  At a minimum you
> > should have a copy of the IMC which is enforced for this location.
> > >
> > > So, someone (you??) must assess the installation per IMC Section
> > 510/511  from end to end.  There is a suppression system reference in
> > Section 510.7.  Some determination needs to be made as to whether the
> > materials are "nonflammable and noncombustible under all conditions
> > and at any concentration" then make the call on suppression.  The
> > entire exhaust system must be engineered to meet the performance
> > characteristics in the IMC.
> > >
> > > Of course, local code amendments will govern as well as any local
> > > AHJ,
> > insurance requirements etc.
> > >
> > > Sprinkler contractors have a long history of being the can-do guys,
> > > with
> > no good way to transfer scope responsibility to the right place.
> > >
> > > Bill Brooks
> > >
> > > William N. Brooks, P.E.
> > > Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
> > > 372 Wilett Drive
> > > Severna Park, MD 21146-1904
> > > 410-544-3620
> > > 410-544-3032 FAX
> > > 412-400-6528 Cell
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Dewayne
> > Martinez
> > > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 7:43 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: fume hood / dust collector - sprinklers in?
> > >
> > > I have a job where they have a small furnace to create molten metal
> > > for
> > castings.  There is a hood (2x8ft) above the area where they take the
> > used probes  and clean them off.  This duct work goes outside to a
> > dust collector.  How do I determine if sprinklers are needed in the
> > hood and ductwork?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Dewayne
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Ron Greenman
> Instructor
> Fire Protection Engineering Technology
> Bates Technical College
> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
> Tacoma, WA 98405
>
> [email protected]
>
> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/
>
> 253.680.7346
> 253.576.9700 (cell)
>
> Member:
> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC
>
> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis
> Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
>
> A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering,
> inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>



-- 
Ron Greenman
Instructor
Fire Protection Engineering Technology
Bates Technical College
1101 So. Yakima Ave.
Tacoma, WA 98405

[email protected]

http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/

253.680.7346
253.576.9700 (cell)

Member:
ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC, WFSC

They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis Bacon,
essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)

A problem well stated is a problem half solved. -Charles F. Kettering,
inventor and engineer (1876-1958)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to