Tom, Unfortunately yes it needs to be in the standard, hence those unscrupulous will leverage the unenforceable. Isn't that why we have to have these "rules" in the first place ?
As for stats, we ought not be reactive, rather proactive. John I would rather be uncomfortable with the truth than to be lied to in comfort. That's just my nature. Jesse Ventura Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/j/jesse_ventura.html#HvUsIUogg0SdI CKB.99 -----Original Message----- From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Watt Sent: Sunday, February 8, 2015 8:16 PM To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org Subject: Re: Relocate sprinklers with drops RETORT I have seen plenty of that also. Some careless, some reckless; mostly clueless. This practice is not limited to used heads though. I have seen more buckets of new heads than old. How many of these fail prematurely? A smart fitter tries to minimize pulling heads when relocating drops because he does not want to risk damaging it. Fitters aren't usually sent out with 10 heads on an add 4, relocate 6, job... for example. I still want to see stats. Is this a problem that requires a "Standard" solution? You can't legislate against stupidity. Jesse Ventura _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
