That was my question. Does the non combustible framing members modify that, or allow for any changes? I am aware of using that for combustible members.
Travis Mack, SET MFP Design, LLC "Follow" us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 Send large files to MFP Design via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign Sent from my iPhone > On May 6, 2015, at 10:06 AM, Eric V. Tysinger <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wouldn't table 8.6.2.2.1(a) indicate 130sqft max? > > Combustible, Unobstructed, with exposed members less than 3'-0 on center. > > > > > Eric V. Tysinger > Designer > Wiginton Fire Systems - Miami, FL > Email: [email protected] > Main: 305-888-2402p3416 > Direct: 305-830-0490 > Fax: 305-888-3804 > Mobile: 239-633-9703 > > > > Confidentiality Notice: > This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. > Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail > and destroy all copies of the original message. > -----Original Message----- > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Travis Mack > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 12:43 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Attic > > It is not fire treated. I already tried that route. I feel like 225 would be > acceptable. Which also begs the question, would ex cov be acceptable? It is > unobstructed construction. I believe the ex cov sprinklers are allowed for > unobstructed combustible. > > Just a rare situation. > > Travis Mack, SET > MFP Design, LLC > "Follow" us on Facebook: > https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 > Send large files to MFP Design via: > https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 6, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Todd - Work <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Good question. I think you could go to 225, but the Book doesn't >> address it. I assume the plywood is not fire treated? Most of the >> times I see this arrangement, the plywood is treated. >> >> Todd G Williams, PE >> Fire Protection Design/Consulting >> Stonington, CT >> www.fpdc.com >> 860-535-2080 (ofc) >> 860-608-4559 (cell) >> Sent using CloudMagic >> [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2] >> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:04 PM, >> [email protected] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> For an attic with light gauge steel trusses spaced 24" on center and >> plywood deck sheathing, would the spacing be limited to 130 sq ft or >> would 225 be acceptable? Slope is 3:12. >> >> Travis Mack, SET >> MFP Design, LLC >> "Follow" us on Facebook: >> https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 >> Send large files to MFP Design via: >> https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl >> er.org _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl >> er.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
