not sure exactly what your say so type slower and use smaller words - lol. I was making the point that it has to be listed for fire protection and not just a UL listing as an electric device. Were you disagreeing with that?
Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering American Fire Sprinkler Assn. --- Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives Dallas, TX http://www.firesprinkler.org <http://www.firesprinkler.org/> > On Jun 16, 2015, at 5:46 AM, Cahill, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just to be clear this is a Listed product, not a whole lot of debate here. > Nowhere does it say UL Listing. The only requirement really where the AHJ > comes in is "included in a list published by an organization that is > acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction". The only debate might be > if LPCB is acceptable to the AHJ. I believe an AHJ (US Fire Marshal or the > like) would lose every time if they tried to not accept. You need approval > of LPCB, not the application of this product. > > That said I agree with those questioning the need for anything but a plain > wet head. Whenever faced with this I ask the owner how they were dealing > with a power outage or roof leak as examples. With some thinking they always > back off and put their money toward protecting their valuable information > from ALL causes of loss not just an irrational fear of sprinklers. > > Chris Cahill, PE* > Associate Fire Protection Engineer > Burns & McDonnell _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
