Am I picturing this correctly?

A lower level of wood 2x's with bat insulation directly on them (paper up), 
then laid on top of the paper (up to the top of  the space) is blown-in 
insulation?

If the paper is fully contained inside non-combustible insulation. 

1 - It seems unlikely that the paper could catch on fire or propagate fire 
across it. 
2 - this seems like the same idea that lets you exclude the rest of the 
combustibles (if the combustible surfaces are completely covered - then there 
are no exposed combustibles)

You could call it 2 separate combustible concealed spaces - one space below the 
paper, one space above the paper. Both spaces are completely filled with 
non-combustible insulation.

Matt Grisé PE*, LEED AP, NICET II  
Sales Engineer 
Alliance Fire Protection 
130 w 9th Ave.
North Kansas City, MO 64116

*Licensed in KS & MO 
 
913.888.0647 ph 
913.888.0618 f 
913.526.7443 cell 
www. AFPsprink.com 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Scott A Futrell
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 7:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Insulation and combustible concealed ceiling space

Has anyone ever had an issue with a combustible concealed space that has one 
layer of kraft-faced batt insulation laying on the ceiling (kraft side up 
toward the sky) and then the remainder filled full of blown-in, non-combustible 
insulation and an AHJ saying the kraft-faced insulation had to be removed?  Or, 
conversely that the kraft-faced was acceptable.  This is fiberglass batt 
insulation, standard thickness for joists/studs with kraft backing.

I’d really like to hear arguments for 1) having to remove the kraft-faced and 
why, and 2) leaving it in place and why.  I want to leave it in place.

Thanks!

Scott Futrell



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to