So the data sheet that Victaulic sent our PM is just as Lamar said, for
heads, drops, gauges, etc. only.
But, that sheet's dated 1980, where the install manual from Mike is 1988...

When i get a copy of the 1980 data sheet, I'll link it to you guys via
dropbox.  (PM keeps forgetting to send it to me)

The Hooker fittings data seemingly all vanished into a black hole, because
you can barely find anything online, even with the proper information.  The
only other sprinkler product I know of that's like that are Omega heads.
Its probably just a coincidence but my gut says these fittings must have
been a huge legal liability for the manufacturer.  At least with the Omegas
you can still see the CPSC website info and news reports, but there are no
datasheets or other catalog cuts available online open to the public.


Benjamin Young

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Mike Hairfield <[email protected]> wrote:

> That's not what it says on the Victaulic Data sheet, want a copy?
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:15:30 -0400
> > Subject: Re: Hooklet tees
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> >
> > The "Hookers" were always intended for use installing sprinkler heads
> only.
> > As a short-cut, there were some contractors who took it a step further
> and
> > used them as you have stated, incorrectly.
> >
> > Lamar Vaughn
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Ben Young <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > In deference to your 'side-arm' comment Mike, I'm going to give this
> to our
> > > PM and call it a smoking gun!
> > >
> > > Thanks again for your help and providing the sheet.
> > >
> > >
> > > Benjamin Young
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Mike Hairfield <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Ben,
> > > > Look at the Victaulic Sheet page 97 it states that they are UL
> Listed for
> > > > branch connections, arm-overs,side-arms ( they must mean guns here)
> > > sprigs,
> > > > drop nipples, and direct sprinkler head connections.Suitable hanger
> > > support
> > > > of branch outlet should be considered to prevent Style 922 rotation.
> > > > Mike
> > > >
> > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 12:44:15 -0400
> > > > > Subject: Re: Hooklet tees
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike,
> > > > >
> > > > > The AHJ is stating that the installation instructions say that
> they are
> > > > not
> > > > > to be used for branch line outlets.
> > > > > I've always taken that to mean that you can't come off a main and
> feed
> > > > > multiple heads with one hooker.
> > > > > The AHJ's interpretation is that this means you cannot come off of
> a
> > > > branch
> > > > > line with them... which makes no sense to anyone at my office.
> > > > >
> > > > > Now, though, after reading the data sheet that Damien linked to,
> where
> > > is
> > > > > says that the strap tees are for heads, drops, or gauages, it
> makes me
> > > > > wonder if they don't have a valid point.
> > > > > http://www.vikinggroupinc.com/usrelated/vgs/V-723.pdf
> > > > >
> > > > > We normally use Grinnell 40-5 strap tees, and they specifically
> say it
> > > > can
> > > > > be used with full lengths of pipe...
> > > > > I've never heard before that you can't (or shouldn't) use strap
> tees
> > > for
> > > > > armovers.
> > > > > http://www.tyco-fire.com/TD_TFP/TFP/TFP1720_05_2015.pdf
> > > > >
> > > > > Just as a backstory, this is an existing 10 story building that
> we're
> > > > doing
> > > > > basically TFO work for on a few floors.  Another GC with another
> > > > sprinkler
> > > > > contractor is doing another TFO on another floor in the building,
> and
> > > all
> > > > > four companies got put on email blast by the AHJ.
> > > > >
> > > > > We are about done with our portion of the job, and the hooker
> fittings
> > > > were
> > > > > basically used as WOLs for the shell spaces.  Our installers won't
> > > touch
> > > > > them, though, and we put it new mechanical tees if we need to
> reuse an
> > > > > outlet (or so I'm told)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Benjamin Young
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Mike Hairfield <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > They are Victaulic #922 Hooker Tees.
> > > > > > How does the AHJ know that they were not installed properly?
> > > > > > Mike
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > > > > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:43:36 -0400
> > > > > > > Subject: Hooklet tees
> > > > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Does anyone have any info on these?  I know our field guys call
> > > them
> > > > > > hooker
> > > > > > > tees, but searching for these things on google has been a
> > > minefield.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nothing on Victaulic's website...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Just to be clear, I'm talking about the strap-style tee with
> the
> > > > one-side
> > > > > > > cast 'hook' that goes around to the back of the piping with the
> > > > snap-off
> > > > > > > lock bolt.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've always kind of treated them like FIT fittings or
> roustabouts:
> > > > > > > interesting concept, poor execution, and don't touch them if
> > > they're
> > > > > > > existing.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We have an AHJ telling us that we have to replace them all on a
> > > > tenant
> > > > > > > fit-out because they were not installed properly.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any help would be appreciated.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Benjamin Young
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to