How big are the freezers? Is stainless steel that expensive?

On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, rongreenman . <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I think their are too many variables for any definitive answer. Chemistry
> of the pipe. Chemistry of the water. How they react to each other. And the
> nature of and how the biologicals interact with their environment.
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 7:13 AM John Paulsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks guys, I DO find all of this helpful, but I was hoping to hear from
>> someone that had experience with the “environmental” conditions of this
>> freezer project and if they had noticed that the constant freezing
>> conditions had inhibited corrosion in the pipes.
>>
>>
>>
>> I agree that under normal freeze thaw cycles, periodic trip testing and
>> condensate water held in the pipe by roll grooves would best be controlled
>> by all of the points mentioned in the thread. I have seen SO many horror
>> stories in attics over the years with plugged lines from fine scale being
>> compacted more at every trip test. I have no trouble explaining to clients
>> why the internal inspection of their system is a critical “must do”
>> maintenance item. But I would like to keep the pipe sizes on this project
>> as small as possible in order to meet the trip times required by the CMSA
>> head that we are using. If we spec schedule 40, it essentially increases
>> the pipe size a diameter.
>>
>>
>>
>> If it’s justified I will do so. But I have this nagging doubt that the
>> freezing temps will preserve the schedule 10… if the seams are fabbed on
>> top of course…
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-
>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Andy Kaempfer
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 4, 2017 9:36 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* RE: Schedule 10 vs Schedule 40 pipe
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>>
>>
>> The most effective measure would be cut grooved sch. 40 black steel using
>> Nitrogen as your supervisory gas instead of shop air. This will eliminate
>> the dam effect at the joint. However, the biggest value for your customer
>> will likely be roll grooved sch. 10 black steel and still using Nitrogen as
>> your supervisory gas.
>>
>>
>>
>> Many arguments can be made about the CRR value which is nothing more than
>> a comparison of the thickness of schedule 40 pipe under the first exposed
>> thread. The “first exposed thread” is the minimum pipe thickness exposed to
>> both interior and exterior corrosion. It occurs at the threaded joint at a
>> line defined by the thread width just before the pipe engages the fitting.
>> There are too many factors to consider when identifying corrosion rates and
>> this ratio is very subjective. Strictly a comparison.
>>
>>
>>
>> As for using Nitrogen as a supervisory gas I think this is definitely the
>> biggest “bang for your buck”. In your particular instance Nitrogen provides
>> you with more than just a corrosion mitigation solution. In particular the
>> low dewpoint of 98%+ N2. A typical refrigerated dryer will only get you
>> somewhere around -40°F dew point and 98% Nitrogen will be somewhere around
>> -60°F dew point (that’s a 50% increase in humidity reduction).
>>
>>
>>
>> Hope you find this helpful.
>>
>>
>>
>> Andy L. Kaempfer
>>
>> Senior Application Engineer – Fire Protection Systems
>>
>> Bull Moose Tube Company
>>
>> 1819 Clarkson Road
>>
>> Chesterfield, MO  63017
>>
>> O: 636-812-9276
>>
>> F:  636-530-5880
>>
>> M: 314-306-2471
>>
>> [image: BullMooseCorporateTagline-black]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-
>> [email protected]
>> <[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *John
>> Paulsen
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 3, 2017 12:34 PM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Schedule 10 vs Schedule 40 pipe
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello Forumites:
>>
>>
>>
>> We are working to develop a bid package for a pair of large freezers and
>> coolers used for food stuffs storage on racks to 35’. The freezers are to
>> be -10 degrees and the coolers will be 31 degrees. The sprinklers systems
>> will be double interlock pre-action with Protecto-wire detection and CMSA
>> sprinklers.
>>
>>
>>
>> My question:     The owner is asking for a recommendation on whether to
>> spec schedule 10 or schedule 40 piping. The concern is long term
>> serviceability of the piping system. My initial thought is that due to the
>> constant low ambient temperatures corrosion would be seriously inhibited
>> for two reasons; any condensate in the pipe would be in frozen form and the
>> low temps would inhibit microbial growth. So my thought is that schedule 10
>> pipe would last the 20 year expected service life of the system. However, I
>> would like to get the thoughts of the forum participants, is the cost of
>> schedule 40 warranted or would schedule 10 service just as well in this
>> application?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance for your responses.
>>
>>
>>
>> John Paulsen – SET
>>
>> Crown Fire System Design
>>
>> 6282 Seeds Rd.
>>
>> Grove City, OH 43123
>>
>> P – 614-782-2438
>>
>> F – 614-782-2374
>>
>> C – 614-348-8206
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Disclaimer*
>>
>> The information contained in this communication from the sender is
>> confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
>> authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
>> notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
>> relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may
>> be unlawful.
>>
>> This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been
>> automatically archived by *Mimecast Ltd*, an innovator in Software as a
>> Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a *safer* and *more useful* place
>> for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and
>> compliance. To find out more Click Here
>> <http://www.mimecast.com/products/>.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
>> org
>>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to