Hola El 6 oct. 2017 23:05, "Bruce Verhei" <[email protected]> escribió:
> LH? We used number of heads. 20. At some older date we used 2” connection. > Depending on layout the old and current are about equivalent. > > Office system not designed with flex heads? Depends. Was there a huge > buffer in original design? But if original had 1” sch 40 drops, that are > changing to flex? Expect to provide them. > > When they created the generous coefficient for quick response and low > ceilings, and combined with EC heads you could get down to six heads in > offices. I remember calling the then incumbent NFPA staff P.E. for pamphlet > 13. > > I asked about very minor T/I’s. The kind that were below our permit > threshold, ‘field review, field inspect”. The answer I received was that > all jobs in hydraulically designed systems require supporting calc’s. > > I felt it was more of a jD answer than a PE answer. > > Best > > Bruce Verhei > > On Oct 6, 2017, at 13:59, rongreenman . <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think maybe large metropolitan areas have the resources to higher a > higher caliber of AHJ. Read that as better trained, more experienced, more > educated in code, what have you. Smaller jurisdictions have slackness, > unhappy firefighters drafted into the FMs office, or guys furiously trying > to learn who will Be subsequently courted by those jurisdictions with > deeper pockets. In the immediate Seattle area most AHJs are knowledgeable, > fair and use good judgement. Some are little Napoleons and others not > really into their jobs but these are rarer than in the areas further > afield. A huge generalization but I think for the most part true. > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:19 PM Kyle.Montgomery <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Travis, >> >> >> >> Are you seeing this in AZ, or are you doing a lot of work in other >> states? It seems like the AHJs we deal with in the valley are usually >> pretty lax on requiring calcs for T.I.s. >> >> >> >> -Kyle M >> >> >> >> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum- >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Travis Mack >> *Sent:* Friday, October 06, 2017 6:16 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Calcs and tenant improvements >> >> >> >> How many of you are being required to calculate systems when you do a >> tenant improvement? Just your run of the mill add/relocate. >> >> >> >> I am seeing it come up more and more. I am seeing it in situations where >> it is mostly relocates and no additions anywhere near the design areas. I >> have one now where the AHJ rejected for no calculations where the shell was >> OH2 and the new space is residential lofts. This particular AHJ wants us to >> show all piping on portions of the floor where no work is being done. They >> are also requiring us to submit plans for the two floors below our space >> that have no work being done. >> >> >> >> Is anyone else seeing stuff like this? >> >> >> >> Travis Mack, SET >> >> MFP Design, LLC >> >> "Follow" us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design- >> LLC/92218417692 >> >> Send large files to MFP Design via: >> >> https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> _______________________________________________ >> Sprinklerforum mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. >> org >> > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. > org > > > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler. > org > >
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
