I would surmise that the 8 foot minimum distance is to prevent 'cold 
soldering'.  The I-beam pockets preclude this from happening, therefore this 
restriction is non applicable to the design problem.


John R. O’Connor,  SET,  RME

National Fire Sprinklers, Inc.
2601 Elm Hill Pike, Suite J
Nashville  TN  37214

Office 615-885-1301
Fax      615-885-7505
Cell     615-519-1118
jocon...@nfspk.com

In God We Trust

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On Behalf 
Of Travis Mack via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 2:56 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: travis.m...@mfpdesign.com; jcrawf...@phaserfire.ca
Subject: RE: ESFR and Obstructed Construction

I was under the impression you still have to maintain 8' minimum between 
sprinklers, even if you are in every beam pocket.  This building may not be 
suitable for ESFR.  

Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, SET
Engineering Manager
MFP Design
3356 E Vallejo Ct
Gilbert, AZ 85298
NEW EXTENSION: 480-505-9271 ext. 700
NEW MOBILE: 480-272-2471
mailto:travis.m...@mfpdesign.com
www.mfpdesign.com

Send large files to us via: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hightail.com%2Fu%2FMFPDesign&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=eGdMZGu2wXhUupGwgGTrqF3b54OP5%2BAZvlHhABSexWY%3D&reserved=0
LinkedIn: 
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Ftravismack&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=tT5E7LsZjSmyreKi4gDCa70EWN%2BZodi%2FhbeCbHNRijI%3D&reserved=0

“The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price 
is forgotten.”

Need/Want a faster way to check material pricing?  Build a material quote?  
Check availability ?   Searching for an invoice?
*If you do not already have an account with ferguson.com, click 
https://www.ferguson.com/account-registration to register.* **Have a Ferguson 
account? Download the Ferguson app for on-the-go access to your favorite 
ferguson.com features. 
http://fergusoncommunications.us.newsweaver.com/hq7bgesq7f/1qtklpp37l9byeftyuoy12/external?email=true&a=6&p=2591775&t=517003
 or 
http://fergusoncommunications.us.newsweaver.com/hq7bgesq7f/n1gewi5ud95byeftyuoy12/external?email=true&a=6&p=2591775&t=517003**

From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On Behalf 
Of James Crawford via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 12:54 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: James Crawford <jcrawf...@phaserfire.ca>
Subject: ESFR and Obstructed Construction

I am looking at a building 36" high that is using beams for the roof 
construction, they are spaced at 6'-0" on center and are 24" deep.

The sprinkler design is asking for ESFR but I am not sure if this will work, I 
know we can use ESFR in obstructed construction but my understanding is the 
heads location still needs to comply with the listing.

So based on this I would need a head in every bay created by the beams and the 
head would need to be 14" or 18" max from the deck.

Am I missing something?

Thank You

James Crawford
Phaser Fire Protection Ltd.
Phone 604-888-0318
Cel: 604-790-0938
Email mailto:jcrawf...@phaserfire.ca<mailto:jcrawf...@phaserfire.ca>
Web: http://www.phaserfire.ca<http://www.phaserfire.ca>

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
mailto:Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to