Thank you Matthew

On Mon, 18 Sep 2023 at 8:57 pm, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I see no basis for placing covers over the sprinklers other than the
> intent already provided for flammables.
>
>
>
> I would see a maintenance nightmare in making sure something like “thin”
> or “.003” is maintained.
>
>
>
> It is dust. Buy a good air compressor and have someone blow it off for a
> little extra pay on the weekend.
>
>
>
> Keep a log of it as well.
>
>
>
> R/
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> *Please rate our customer service
> <https://survey.medallia.com/?emailsignature&fc=3539&bg=Fire%20and%20Fabrication>*
>
>
>
> *Matthew J. Willis, CWBSP, CET*
>
> *Engineering Manager – Southwest Region*
>
> *FERGUSON FIRE DESIGN, LLC*
>
> *A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Ferguson Fire & Fabrication, LLC*
>
> West Monroe, LA. 71292
>
> C: 307-236-8249
>
> *[email protected] <[email protected]>*
>
> *www.FergusonFire.com <http://www.fergusonfire.com/>*
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael de Gabriele <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 16, 2023 8:57 PM
> *To:* Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject:* [Sprinklerforum] Re: Best fire protection solution for dirty
> environment
>
>
>
> Has anyone ever done this to a 10000m2 warehouse?
>
>
>
> On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 at 2:37 am, Jackie Ward <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> For paint spray areas, we bag our heads.  It sounds like your environment
> would be similar.  The following is from the 2019 edition of NFPA-13 for
> reference.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Jackie “JW” Ward
>
> 1-405-240-7076
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael de Gabriele <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Friday, September 15, 2023 6:05 PM
> *To:* Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers <
> [email protected]>
> *Subject:* [Sprinklerforum] Best fire protection solution for dirty
> environment
>
>
>
> Good morning
>
> I trust that everyone is well
>
> I currently have a project in Geelong Australia where the product bulk
> stored within the buildings make for a extremely dusty environment when
> unloading.
>
> Sprinkler protection is proposed to protect the building and wanted to ask
> the question about “excessive loading of sprinklers” and what the best
> option would be to minimise this
>
> I am aware that NFPA 25 mentions this, our code in Australia does not
> mention this term but states that yearly the sprinklers must be visually
> checked and suggest that a more stringent maintenance routine be in place
> for these environments.
>
>
>
> The product bulk stored is phosphate rock typically and is used for the
> fertiliser manufacturing plant across the road.
>
>
>
> Any suggestions to the above query would be much appreciated.
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Michael Paul de Gabriele
>
> Fire protections engineer
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> SprinklerForum mailing list:
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> [email protected]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> SprinklerForum mailing list:
> https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> [email protected]
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to