I would think residential sprinklers meet the intent of NFPA 13R. Foyers, 
corridors, and hallways [6.2.2.2(2), 6.2.2.2(3), and 6.2.2.2(4)] are used for 
egress; hallways generally contain negligible combustibles and present a low 
fire challenge. Stairways are very similar, paths of egress and almost no fire 
load is present due to egress.

Look very close ate the FAQ of 7.2.1, NFPA 13R requires only that the design 
discharge, number of design sprinklers, sprinkler coverage, and position of 
sprinklers comply with NFPA 13, for areas outside the dwelling.


Joe
Burtell | SET, CFPS
Fire Sprinkler Manager
D
C


406-204-4653
406-861-4507
3004 1st Ave South
Billings,
MT 59101
Office: 406-652-7697
www.summitfiresecurity.com
This information transmitted, including attachments, is intended only for the 
person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this 
in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this information.
From: Trevor Spain <supp...@igneusinc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 7:13 AM
To: Fpdcdesign via Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Residential heads in stairways


CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not follow 
guidance, click links, or open attachments unless you KNOW the content is safe.

Good Morning Everyone,

Our design team is debating the use of residential heads in stairways. For a 
predominately residential occupancy (like an apartment) designed to 2016 NFPA 
13R, do stairways qualify for residential heads under 6.2.2.2 (8) “Other areas 
with fire loads similar to residential fire loads”?

If the design is to 2016 NFPA 13 instead, can a stairway be considered 
“corridor” to meet the requirement of 8.4.5.1 for use of residential heads?

Trevor Spain



The Fire Group, Inc.

www.thefiregroupinc.com<http://www.thefiregroupinc.com>
On 9/18/2023 2:25 PM, Alan Brinson wrote:
Calcium phosphate is inert.

Alan Brinson
________________________________
From: JOSEPH MCCAFFERTY 
<joemccaffe...@virginmedia.com><mailto:joemccaffe...@virginmedia.com>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 7:16:19 PM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org><mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>;
 Michael de Gabriele <mpdegabri...@gmail.com><mailto:mpdegabri...@gmail.com>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Re: Best fire protection solution for dirty 
environment

Do the sprinklers etc need corrosion protection from the stored product as well?
On 17/09/2023 01:56 Michael de Gabriele 
<mpdegabri...@gmail.com><mailto:mpdegabri...@gmail.com> wrote:


Has anyone ever done this to a 10000m2 warehouse?

On Sun, 17 Sep 2023 at 2:37 am, Jackie Ward 
<jw...@firetrol.net<mailto:jw...@firetrol.net>> wrote:

For paint spray areas, we bag our heads.  It sounds like your environment would 
be similar.  The following is from the 2019 edition of NFPA-13 for reference.



[cid:image001.png@01D9EBC4.33154690]







Thank you,



Jackie “JW” Ward

1-405-240-7076



From: Michael de Gabriele 
<mpdegabri...@gmail.com<mailto:mpdegabri...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2023 6:05 PM
To: Discussion list on issues relating to automatic fire sprinklers 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>>
Subject: [Sprinklerforum] Best fire protection solution for dirty environment



Good morning

I trust that everyone is well

I currently have a project in Geelong Australia where the product bulk stored 
within the buildings make for a extremely dusty environment when unloading.

Sprinkler protection is proposed to protect the building and wanted to ask the 
question about “excessive loading of sprinklers” and what the best option would 
be to minimise this

I am aware that NFPA 25 mentions this, our code in Australia does not mention 
this term but states that yearly the sprinklers must be visually checked and 
suggest that a more stringent maintenance routine be in place for these 
environments.



The product bulk stored is phosphate rock typically and is used for the 
fertiliser manufacturing plant across the road.



Any suggestions to the above query would be much appreciated.



Kind regards

Michael Paul de Gabriele

Fire protections engineer



_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org>

_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 
sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org>





_________________________________________________________

SprinklerForum mailing list:

https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org

To unsubscribe send an email to 
sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org>
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sprinklerforum-le...@lists.firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to