the "c" namespace is only for table columns. if we wanted a namespace that had represented mapper properties, which is not just column-mapped attributes but relationships as well, that would be something else altogether. we'd have to define a whole package of expression objects that represent class attributes instead of columns. its not necessarily a bad idea but its a big can of worms (this notion came up many months ago as well)...it would sort of be like porting HQL, more or less.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
