On Jul 17, 2007, at 11:49 AM, svilen wrote:
> > On Tuesday 17 July 2007 18:01:12 Michael Bayer wrote: >>> if u can make the a query( primary_mapper, select_table) somehow >>> possible... i won't need separate NPs. Note this selecttable is >>> not additional .select() off the query, it IS the starting >>> query(), e.g. thepolymorphic union in a big case and >>> base-class-only in a small case. >> >> query(class).from_statement(your select) ? > i tried it, my_select would be something which the NP mapper does > itself now, e.g. select( [class_join], base.c.type=='classname')... > naah, as i see from srccode this misses the whole compile() stuff. > i want to be able to do additional filtering, ordering, whatever a > query can do. > Note i said the starting query, not the final query... what part of the selecting from are you looking for to be replaced ? the columns clause ? or the criterion ? compilation wants to add all the columns from the mapper's table, want to make that optional ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
