What popular misunderstanding would that be? I have no problem with any of the terminology from S/A. It all seems unambiguous, and makes sense.
Of course, I also studied database theory, relational algebra, and relational calculus at university. ~jon On Jul 27, 5:29 am, avdd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 27, 9:45 am, jason kirtland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is the last opportunity > > for terminology changes for a while, so I offer this up for discussion. > > Does anyone else think "orm.relation" is wrong? Perhaps > "relationship" if you must have a noun, or "relates_to", etc, but > "relation" could cement the popular misunderstanding of "relational > database". > > a. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---