Marco wrote: > > svilen ha scritto: > >> Anyway it may depend which audience are u targeting with these >> names - those who never seen an API or those for which names >> are important only to associate them with a >> library/version/use-case... both extremes are equaly >> uninteresting imo. >> > > I think targeting those who read Fowler's book (or really should) > is good enough :-) > MetaData is not ambiguous. > > One of the things I liked at first about SA is that, having just > bought the book, it had several of the book's patterns with the > same names.
I agree that hitting familiar pattern names is good, but I'm not sure I agree that our MetaData class is Fowler's Metadata pattern, or a profitable entry point for walking through the SQLAlchemy metadata mapping strategy: mapper(Class, table) is the magic, and no MetaData in sight. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
