Michael Bayer wrote: > well, i can support this in 0.5 trunk. in rev 4965, If a descriptor > is present on a class, or if the name is excluded via the include/ > exclude lists, the attribute will not be instrumented via the > inherited mapper or via the mapped Table. So your example works with > just the @property alone.
The r4965 changeset has the side-effect that any previously instrumented attribute will be excluded, too (since ``InstrumentedAttribute`` obviously has the __get__-property). But actually, while I think it's good that any descriptor will be found (not only property-derived ones), this changeset does not solve my particular issue (the property I wanted to exclude was always excluded by ``_should_exclude``). I'll try to put together an example that correctly demonstrates the issue I'm having. \malthe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
