Thanks for the responses so far. The reason we tried pymssql is because it is much easier to get running on OSX. At the moment our efforts to get pyodbc working on Macs have met with alot of frustration.
However, we would have done things differently if we had seen different wording in the SqlAlchemy docs. For instance, a notice that binary fields do not work with pymssql. This would have put us down the pyodbc path right away. Instead, I found the non-specific statement in the MSSQL Known Issues section. I then searched for what those issues were and found plenty of Unicode Type issues but nothing really relating to Binary types. So, with all the above in mind we are proceeding down the pyodbc path. For the project, I am not asking for any work to be done on pymssql but rather that the Known Issues section be clarified to state that Binary Types do not work. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
