On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfre...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Michael Bayer <mike...@zzzcomputing.com> > wrote: >> that's a lot of effort there. How confident are you that memory and >> references are handled correctly in the .c code? > > Quite. It's not my first C extension. But, truly, C is complex.
And as I write this... I find an... issue (not leak, but not good reference management either). Sorry. Feel free to gauge cost-benefit here. I'll think about pyrex too. Have in mind that I'll be using SQLAlchemy for years to come (or expect to). I don't think I shall withdraw support in the short term, but an oracle I am not. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
SQLAlchemy-0.7.10-cinstrumented.patch
Description: Binary data
