> So there is no valid use case for parallel generation of tables > except in particular kinds of multi-tenancy situations.
I find my use case simple enough (and therefore very valid). I am going to manage two database tables by corresponding Python classes with SQLAlchemy services. I would appreciate if I can fill these data structures in parallel without a serial database preparation step (table creation with repeated meta-data specification). Regards, Markus -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
