This is not recommended, since it leads to dissemination via the list of messages returned from bad auto-responders and MTAs. Also, it may lead to public replies to the list where personal replies were intended. In addition, the original ``Reply-To:'' header is lost. If you do want to add a reply-to list header, put ``reply-to'' into DIR/headerremove, and ``Reply-To: list at host.dom'' into DIR/headeradd.
So now I'm thinking I should follow this advice and leave the Reply-To: header as it is. Thoughts anyone?
I'm new around here so don't count my opinion too much but I really dislike it when the posts do not go back to the list. I find it more often leads to private replies when public replies were intended (since people just hit reply and start typing). Just to send this message to the list I had to "reply to all" then go into the header and delete your email address. I think it's better to foster discussion in the list and have all posts archived.
Programmer/Analyst WebMotif Net Services, Inc. 1.800.332.WIPS Direct: 604.299.1908 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
