On 16 Oct 2003 at 11:03, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > 9.8 Setting ``Reply-To: list at host''. > > This is not recommended, since it leads to dissemination via the list of > > messages returned from bad auto-responders and MTAs. Also, it may lead to > > public replies to the list where personal replies were intended. In > > addition, the original ``Reply-To:'' header is lost. ... > > So now I'm thinking I should follow this advice and leave the > Reply-To: header as it is. Thoughts anyone?
This is a longstanding debate. Most more-experienced net-folk prefer reply-to- author, newer-net-folk seem to lean toward reply-to-list [not absolute either way of course, just the general tendency]. I'm solidly in the reply-to-author camp. More here: <http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html> /Bernie\ -- Bernie Cosell Fantasy Farm Fibers mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pearisburg, VA --> Too many people, too few sheep <-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
