Right -- my question is still unanswered as to why the code was merged in.
I have tremendous respect for this project and everyone involved in it, so
please understand I'm not trying to call into question your decisions --
I'd just like clarification as to why this was included now?

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:

> On 8/4/17, Charles Leifer <colei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > My excitement quickly turned to disappointment as I realized that the
> > extension is unusable for all practical purposes:
> >
>
> Yes, it needs work.  That is why it is unannounced.
>
> --
> D. Richard Hipp
> d...@sqlite.org
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to