Right -- my question is still unanswered as to why the code was merged in. I have tremendous respect for this project and everyone involved in it, so please understand I'm not trying to call into question your decisions -- I'd just like clarification as to why this was included now?
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Richard Hipp <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/4/17, Charles Leifer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My excitement quickly turned to disappointment as I realized that the > > extension is unusable for all practical purposes: > > > > Yes, it needs work. That is why it is unannounced. > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
