On 9/1/06, chetana bhargav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It does make a difference with embedded deivces, where both speed and memory constraints matter a lot.
I'll check my assumptions when I get some time but I thought interpreting an sql statement cost only a few milliseconds of time. I would think saving it to a rotating disk would be worse. It would cost on average a half disk rotation of latency to read it. Flash memory has no rotational latency so it might be faster. Maybe my understanding is wrong but it seems saving prepared statements would be either worse, in terms of time, or of minimal benefit. You might get a few milliseconds at startup but only if your storage medium has no latency. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
