Quoth "James K. Lowden" <[email protected]>, on 2013-07-12 12:30:13 -0400: > as the first one reads it. In fact, I'd be interested if you could > point to a single standard C library function that, when called > out-of-sequence, doesn't return an error but permits the process to > proceed destructively.
free(). Now, can we stop the repeated philosophical arguments about these sort of things on the SQLite list? They are getting old and drifting off topic, I think. ---> Drake Wilson _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
