On Dec 24, 2008, at 1:25 PM, texmass wrote: > > Technically I think this could mean a lot of things. For example I > can > imagine that the authentication process you described is different for > the rhapsody client than for rhapsody direct. Or maybe the > authentication through rhapsody direct is prioritized low and so the > server response is worse. But I would also suggest that a 3rd > alternative is that all 3 get the same level of errors but that sb > just > does not handle it as gracefully. I don't dispute as you say that the > Rhapsody side has problems, but just the list of somewhat cryptic > error > messages you cited would lend me to believe that error handling may > not > be as robust as it should be (yes, I am a geek that does SQA for a > living).
Rhapsody Direct is completely different from how the PC client operates. Your Roku is also using the PC client for communication. I'm not surprised the PC client doesn't have any problems, it probably only authenticates once for example, instead of on every request. _______________________________________________ squeezenetwork mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/squeezenetwork
