dansguardian has the same functionality as squidguard, and claims it does it faster, why do you want to run both?
Harrison On 21 Mar 2003 at 6:00, Jesse Strycker wrote: > > Since there's been a lot of proxy combination talk > lately, I started wondering about some proxy chaining > of my own. I looked around, but couldn't find records > of anyone doing the following. > > I am considering the feasibility of chaining > squidguard, dansguardian, and adzapper. I am also > seeing if i could add a virus scanner to that chain, > but that's for another post sometime down the road. > > I may be thinking about this all wrong, but the chain > i'm considering is as follows: > > client -> squidguard -> dansguardian -> adzapper -> > net > > The reasoning is that if the client shouldn't be > viewing the site in the first place, why even send the > request to the others. If it passes squidguard, then > Dan's can check for content. If it is still okay, then > adzapper could handle any associated ads. > > Does this sounds reasonable? Any horrible flaws i'm > overlooking. Any suggestions how to best link them? > Thank you for your time and consideration. > > Jesse > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! > http://platinum.yahoo.com
