dansguardian has the same functionality as squidguard, and claims it 
does it faster, why do you want to run both?

Harrison

On 21 Mar 2003 at 6:00, Jesse Strycker wrote:

> 
>  Since there's been a lot of proxy combination talk
> lately, I started wondering about some proxy chaining
> of my own. I looked around, but couldn't find records
> of anyone doing the following.
> 
>  I am considering the feasibility of chaining
> squidguard, dansguardian, and adzapper. I am also
> seeing if i could add a virus scanner to that chain,
> but that's for another post sometime down the road.
> 
>  I may be thinking about this all wrong, but the chain
> i'm considering is as follows:
> 
>  client -> squidguard -> dansguardian -> adzapper ->
> net
> 
>  The reasoning is that if the client shouldn't be
> viewing the site in the first place, why even send the
> request to the others. If it passes squidguard, then
> Dan's can check for content. If it is still okay, then
> adzapper could handle any associated ads.
> 
>  Does this sounds reasonable? Any horrible flaws i'm
> overlooking. Any suggestions how to best link them?
> Thank you for your time and consideration.
> 
> Jesse
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
> http://platinum.yahoo.com


Reply via email to