-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jesse Strycker wrote:
> My understanding was that dansguardian was a
> context/content based filter versus a url and domain
> blocker/redirector like squidguard. I may have
> "crossed some wires" though as I have been researching
> a number of related topics as of late.

DansGuardian can do url blocking, mime-type blocking, file extension
blocking etc.  It just doesn't do redirection like squidGuard.

>
> Jesse
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>dansguardian has the same functionality as
>>squidguard, and claims it
>>does it faster, why do you want to run both?
>>
>>Harrison
>>
>>On 21 Mar 2003 at 6:00, Jesse Strycker wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Since there's been a lot of proxy combination
>>
>>talk
>>
>>>lately, I started wondering about some proxy
>>
>>chaining
>>
>>>of my own. I looked around, but couldn't find
>>
>>records
>>
>>>of anyone doing the following.
>>>
>>> I am considering the feasibility of chaining
>>>squidguard, dansguardian, and adzapper. I am also
>>>seeing if i could add a virus scanner to that
>>
>>chain,
>>
>>>but that's for another post sometime down the
>>
>>road.
>>
>>> I may be thinking about this all wrong, but the
>>
>>chain
>>
>>>i'm considering is as follows:
>>>
>>> client -> squidguard -> dansguardian -> adzapper
>>
>>->
>>
>>>net
>>>
>>> The reasoning is that if the client shouldn't be
>>>viewing the site in the first place, why even send
>>
>>the
>>
>>>request to the others. If it passes squidguard,
>>
>>then
>>
>>>Dan's can check for content. If it is still okay,
>>
>>then
>>
>>>adzapper could handle any associated ads.
>>>
>>> Does this sounds reasonable? Any horrible flaws
>>
>>i'm
>>
>>>overlooking. Any suggestions how to best link
>>
>>them?
>>
>>>Thank you for your time and consideration.
>>>
>>>Jesse


- --
James A. Pattie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux  --  SysAdmin / Programmer
Xperience, Inc.
http://www.pcxperience.com/
http://www.xperienceinc.com/

GPG Key Available at http://www.pcxperience.com/gpgkeys/james.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+e20HtUXjwPIRLVERArIyAKCi18eXdryn+j3Xsk3bw4Yb54COuQCfbsKX
aLCUnhWRLR2+ifuBGwygp3E=
=qCSV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Reply via email to